Friday 21 December 2012

Happy Holidays!




 To those who love Jesus (Peace be upon Him) and Lady Mary (Peace be upon Her). To those who believe in Their message of peace and Their mission to alleviate the suffering of humanity. 

I’d like to wish you the best life possible on this planet and hereafter. We believe in the same message of peace, brought up by Prophet Jesus (PBUH) and Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and all other prophets. 

I wish you all a happy and peaceful Christmas and New Year celebration. Ameen.

Wednesday 19 December 2012

The Ostrich Doctor


I didn’t think I would have to write a blog like this, especially at this time of year. I hoped and I prayed for something like this to never happen again.  Killing is a crime, no questions asked. However, killing children is a crime against humanity.

We must discuss and address the root causes of such issues, to prevent tragedies from happening again.  In my opinion, it’s a complex issue and it doesn’t just boil down to the social fabric of the country, the freedom of possessing guns, a bad foreign policy, disconnection with Diaspora communities, misinterpretation of religious texts, political lies or laws favouring the rich over the poor. No. The root causes are many and we mustn’t bury our heads in the sand like ostriches.

I am also very sad to see there are opportunistic companies taking advantage of parents’ fears for their children’s safety with highly expensive security devices, costing hundreds of dollars/British pounds.

In my opinion, if a patient is sick, then the doctor has to find out the root cause of the illness. The doctor can decide accordingly how to treat the illness – with medicines or through surgery. As long as our politicians and decision-makers are acting like incompetent doctors, trying to treat some symptoms without realising what the root causes of the problem are, and then burying their heads in the sand like ostriches, there won’t be a solution.

It is time to sit down together and discuss what is the way forward and how can our children have a future.

Tuesday 13 November 2012

(Mis)Perceptions Part 1





I would like to apologise for my prolonged absence from the blog. My health and a full diary have prevented me from being able to write to you more often, but I hope insh’Allah that I will be able to discuss with you as friends more often from now on.

This series of blogs, I’ve named it Perceptions, but in reality it should be called Misperceptions.  It all started when I was at a workshop about children in conflict zones.  After preparing a presentation, I decided to change my talk 180 degrees. I felt our discussion was looking only at the symptoms as opposed to finding the root cause of the problem. It was a Catch 22 situation.

With regards to perceptions and misperceptions, I want to ask you a few questions. If you hear about a Muslim man having four wives, what would you say? If you hear about a Mormon man with 35 wives, what would be your reaction? How about a man from the Dinka tribe with 67 wives? Finally, how do you feel when you hear about a Western man having 10 girlfriends?

Perceptions are developed according to our upbringing and culture. These factors can make us not accept other ways of thinking.  Only when we will understand the other person’s values, culture and beliefs, we will become less judgemental and an asset to our community.

To be continued...

Saturday 18 August 2012

Eid Mubarak!


Eid is a time to celebrate the success of achievements. Eid is a time to reflect your gratitude to the Lord who makes us happy and the people who help us feel this happiness. Eid is a bond to tie you to everyone who cares and prays for you. Eid is a climactic moment of joy and submission to the Lord who has created you.

Eid is a platform to bridge the gap between us and different communities. Eid is a duty to make us responsible to look after our neighbours, regardless of their backgrounds. Eid is a commitment to care for your parents and your family. Eid is an instrument to draw a smile on the face of every child.

Eid is a care for the homeless, orphans, widows, the sick, the poor and the disabled. Men and women, children and others.

Please celebrate Eid with everyone! Eid Mubarak!

Wednesday 25 July 2012

Burma

ماينامار بورما هى أقبح جريمه فى وجه الإنسانيه.

تغذيب , تطهير عرقى , إغتصاب جماعى منظم لطرد الأقليه من مسلمى الروهنجا.

تمنياتى الحاره بشهر رمضان وإقامة وتحقيق مبادئ الحريه والعداله والمساواه.

تمنياتى بالنجاح لمؤسسات الأمم المتحده, منظمة التعاون الإسلامى, رابطة العالم الإسلامى, مجموعة آسيان, ومؤسسات حقوق الإنسان والجمعيات الخيريه , كل مسلم ومسلمه وكل إنسان ومسئول.

Burma (Maynmar) is an ugly scar and a crime against humanity.

Torture, forced and organised group rape, massacre and forced migration to Rohingya muslim minority.

Happy Ramadan, freedom, justice and equality to humanity.

All the best to UN, OIC, ASIAN, World Muslim League, Human Right movement, charity organisations, every muslim and human being, leaders as well as others

Friday 20 July 2012

Welcome, welcome to Ramadan!


We thank Allah who let us see the beginning of Ramadan and we hope that He will let us observe the ending of Ramadan. We hope that He will make this month for us a month of working hard and increasing our productivity, as well as worshipping Him.

Oh, Allah, guide the misguided amongst us and those whom we think our enemies. Give them an abundance of your givings!

We need to know that this month is not a month of watching drama on TV, or eating plenty of food or attending iftar parties. This is a month of mercy, obedience, good manners and faithful relationships with one another.

Ramadan may be the generous guest visiting us, but please remember and love the Most Generous who sent Him to us and follow the footsteps of His messengers. Thank Him for the bounty of His giving and love your neighbours. Help the needy and save your souls by praying to the Prophet who has given us the best of guidance, Mohammed, son of Abdullah (PBUH).

Oh, Allah, make me amongst those under the shade of this prayer.  Jumma Mubaraka to you and I love you all!

Monday 16 July 2012

Work in progress...

I have been absent for quite a while due to health problems but insh'Allah I will be able to post new blogs soon for you to read.

Meanwhile, I leave you with my thought of the day:

نداء الفجر.

أنا لاأخشى على نفسى من ذنوبى , لأن رحمتك سبقت عذابك , وأنت أرحم الراحمين. فاغفرلى.
Dawn prayer

I am not afraid of my sins because your mercy is always ahead of your punishment, and you are the most merciful. Please forgive me

Friday 13 July 2012

العمل الخيرى.Charity work

جمعه مباركه.Wishing you Jumma Mubaraka.

العمل الخيرى.Charity work.

جاهل وكاذب من قال أن العمل الخيرى (أو جمعيته الخيريه) ليس له مصاريف إداريه , ومصاريف جمعيته الإداريه 0% .

الجنه هى المكان الوحيد الذى لا يوجد فيه مصاريف إداريه لتغير طبيعة ساكنيها , فلا تعب ولا نصب ولا صخب ولا دمار ولا بناء ولا تنميه . إنما جزاء ونعيم ومتعة وهناء مكفولين برضى صاحبها الذى لاتأخذه سنة ولا نوم.

كفوا عن خداع المانحين بإسم الدين , لا يوجد شئ فى الدنيا ليس له مصاريف إداريه , ولا تتبعوا آراء الفقه الضيق الأفق والغريب والمستورد المقسم للمجتمعات!

لاتتجروا بالدين من أجل حفنة دولارات توارون بها عجزكم على الإجتهاد والإبداع المجتمعى.

Charity work.

Ignorant or liers are those who claim that their charity organisation takes 0% admin cost.

Heaven is the only place that is having 0% admin cost because of The Creator and it's nature. In heaven there is no suffering, fatigue, struggle, destruction, development, construction.. etc. It's happiness, joy, comfort and ease as a reward from The Creator to it's residence.

Stop fooling donors using the banner of religion. There is nothing in life that has 0% admin cost. Do not follow the narrow minded strange imported divisive opinions of the the so called Imams!

Do not bargain our religion for an extra few dollars to cover up for your inability to start new innovative community initiatives.

Wishing you Jumma Mubaraka

Friday 1 June 2012

Humanitarian Climate Change

Grassroot level
Today we celebrate our success story. This is due to the tireless effort put in by a group of partners who believe they can be successful together. We congratulate the OIC, UN OCHA and LAS, as well as our local and international partners for supporting our commonly shared values and objectives: promoting localism and drawing its global impact with us on the humanitarian map.

Our success stories for Somalia and Yemen are three years in the making. It took us three years to raise the local voice so that it can bear fruits and others can pick them up and share their values. 

We started this process for Somalia in October 2010 in Nairobi to see our harvest festival in May 2012 in Istanbul.  I am talking about the pre-conference consultation meeting for civil society organisations which took place on 31st May in Istanbul and which managed to raise Somali voice on an international level.  What has been planted by all of in Nairobi, Mogadishu, London and Istanbul has resulted in a beautiful symphony composed by the Somali orchestra.

The same happened as a result of our dedicated work for Yemen. The results speak volumes, not about our achievements, but about the commitment and dedication of the local communities. It is a great achievement for them not only to be heard, but to have a leading role amongst the international and multilateral institutions.

Humanitarian climate change is difficult to obtain, especially if some don’t believe in the concept of localism. If localism isn’t a solution outright, it is most certainly one of the most important components of the solution that can help save humanity from suffering. It can save us from the corruption of decision makers. It can stop resources being wasted and dreams from being dashed.

Humanitarian climate change is happening as we speak and we are inviting you not only to be a positive part in it but to take a leading role in driving it.

We believe in building real partnerships based on equality, transparency and impartiality. Let us give local people the power to lead so we can let history talk about new achievements.

Friday 25 May 2012

Giving...

Giving to the sick, the orphaned and the desperately in need is fine.  I am asking: why not use giving as a preventive medicine? If we cement giving socially, it can become a daily habit, as natural as putting on your shoes and looking out the window. We, our kids and our community can give every day. Why wait for disaster to strike? You can prevent disasters from having a devastating impact by giving.

I was shocked when I heard in the past, in the aftermath of the great tsunami, that no more money is needed because humanitarian organisations cannot spend it. In my view, we should be interested in trying to prevent tsunamis from having the devastating effect they are having. We should be interested in discussing the effects of climate change, pollution, global warming and others. We should be interested in giving.

Giving is not just about money; it’s about time, effort, knowledge and thoughts. Giving is about a new climate change that makes us contribute every day to society.

Let us give justly.

Tuesday 22 May 2012

And they called her Dignity...

Dignity is the result of credibility. Credibility is the outcome of authority. Authority is a God given right to human beings to look after humanity. When we look at our father and mother and their creation, we find that this cycle of abuse needs to end.

We, as men and women, come from our mother Eve. The dignity of woman is equal to the dignity of man and the authority of woman should be equal to the authority of man. In my view, authority means taking responsibility for our communities.

If a man abuses his authority because a woman can be physically weaker, that man is abusing a whole community. The issue of abuse, rape and sexual harassment is as old as the age of humanity. Why does the civilised world of the 21st century turn a blind eye, keep a deaf ear and turn its back on the victims of such a degrading act?

I cannot believe what I read recently on twitter:






The phrase “national sport” upsets me especially.  Is my mother, my wife, my daughter, my auntie a ball, a net or a stick people toy with?

Our world has a big issue to address through fairness and justice. Do we just turn our back to the victims, whether they are African, Asian, Latino, White, Aboriginal etc.?

We need to come back to the basics of life and remember that humanity cannot function with one hand, cannot be driven on one wheel, cannot see through one eye, heard through one ear or built by one individual. Humanity has to be built by two partners that God created from one another through dignity, respect, honour and equality. If we lose one, we lose humanity.

Monday 14 May 2012

A doughnut please...

When I was a young boy, playful and energetic, barely in primary school, my mother wisely told me to mix with the less fortunate children.  In my opinion, this is a good way to bring up children in the middle of a cosmopolitan city such as Cairo.

Some people look down on the poor, oprhans, destitute and cannot imagine that somehow, someway, these people could be as “good” as they are or achieve as many things as they can potentially achieve.  When some people see an orphan or a poor child wearing nice clothes, riding a new bicycle or eating a doughnut, they get shocked and think that such things should be above their reach.  In my opinion , thinking that some people are beneath and undeserving is wrong.

The doughnut dilemma is, sadly, happening in the humanitarian field as well. Young, dynamic, innovative organisations are being overlooked. We talk about impartiality, partnership, transparency and empowerment. However, we gasp in shock, just like some people when they see orphans holding a doughnut, when an organisation has an initiative. We look at the size and resources of an organisation, just as we judge an orphan’s appearance.

Whenever I see this attitude in the humanitarian family, I remember what my mother used to tell me when I was a young boy, playing football in the back streets of Cairo. She used to say: “Son, people look at an orphan with pity until they see them eating a doughnut. Then they gasp in shock because they think they don’t deserve good things”.

Thursday 3 May 2012

The climate change and the cooking pot

Today I want to talk to you about another type of climate change.  Some places have four seasons in the year, whereas others have only two. Each season has its own climate and harvest potential.  God is the only one that makes the seasons change and maintains the climate, however human beings are the ones that cannot sit still and always look for change.

We have seen the big debate on the negative climate change that is leading slowly to global warming, desertification and large areas. However, in my opinion, we have also started to see a positive climate change. This time, it’s not about the weather, but about the social climate change. 

Last year, four Arab countries managed to successfully lift the lid of the cooking pot. We have yet to see if they will manage to change what’s inside the cooking pot.

This reminds me of the damage unexpected storms can do to harvests.  Both farmers and change-makers need to realise that taking off the lid is not the end, but the beginning of a long-term process of social climate change. A cooking pot brewing for 35-40 years is bound to have some problems.

I would also like to advise the young change-makers that the national pot doesn’t belong in the national kitchen, but in the international cuisine, doing everyone proud.

Monday 16 April 2012

The Power

I was invited to deliver a speech at the University in Cairo about humanitarian work as soft power. As we all know, the socio-political and economic field recognises two types of power: hard (politics, economy, military) and soft (media, culture, art, history, religion, fashion, food, sports, technology, language, education, human resources).

In my opinion, westernised audiences are familiar with the effectiveness of the soft power; however I wanted to talk about the context of the Arab Spring.

In my opinion, power reflects strength, ability, command and vision. Soft power, in my understanding, should be the one which can make a change without conflict or over a long period of time. In the cases of Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Tunisia, one of the emerging powers in the Arab Spring has been that of women.

The Soft Power doesn’t stop at those mentioned above; for example, Hard Power can have its own Soft Power, often used by governments to implement policies using the “Carrot and Stick” approach.
While reading around this topic, I came up with a new term: “Rough Power”. This surprised the academia in the room and I saw a few raised eyebrows and shrugging.

In my opinion, Rough Power is the Soft Power that has been changed from being soft, smooth and conflict-free to become confrontational and conflicting for the community. Such examples of soft powers that have been transformed into rough powers are religion and history.

In the example of religion, so-called scholars have misinterpreted certain aspects of the sacred texts. Narrow-mindedness and taking things out of context, together with not keeping up with the times and the emerging culture of civil society has lead to the transformation of religion into Rough Power in some cases, in my opinion.

On the other hand, history has been corrupted as well. Let us take the history written about Muslim communities and countries. It is all about war, conquests, bloodshed, coup d’état, political manoeuvres etc, without focusing on the social aspect of the lives of the millions of people that lived in these countries. Historians failed to mention the achievements of the Soft Power, focusing instead on the Hard Power: military etc.

Another good example of a Soft Power changed into Rough Power is the Media. For various reasons, whether economical or others, some Media outlets fuel cross-cultural conflicts instead of encouraging partnerships.

In my opinion, in every situation, it is a question of moral value. Soft, Hard or Rough, it is still a form of power and it should be used by the citizens to help other citizens. It is not for citizens to use against other citizens. If we focus on the shared values of the citizens of the globe and we use all the power to empower others and maintain the life of other creatures, we are both serving and saving the life of humanity.

Friday 13 April 2012

The Law Taker

A friend of mine read my blog the other day and was puzzled because they couldn’t understand who the Law Taker was. We left it out intentionally for you to puzzle over so congratulations to those of you that spotted it.

The Law Takers are those people in suits, tuxedos, tailcoats, evening dresses or ball gowns. That’s not all. They also sit at desks in the high offices of power: governments, political parties and economical institutions. They are the ones who are having the final say in the boardroom.

These people will always manage to take the law their way and then bend it, twist it and change it in their favour.

This is why I call them Law Takers. Any investigator will fail in pinning them down and getting the ultimate truth out of them, because even if they have broken moral laws, they haven’t broken any civil laws.

We have seen many such cases all over the world recently. They take the law in their pocket, while we’re left with empty pockets.

Monday 2 April 2012

Some change please!

Don’t worry, I’m not going to ask you for money, as the title implies. I am asking you for change.

A friend of mine once told me that the only constant in life is change. Change is happening all around us, day and night, every hour and every second. Sometimes we realise, some other times we do not realise, because we are too busy to look around ourselves. Change is part of nature and all creations of God on earth. If we accept that change is part of nature, a process, how can we accept the evolution of change?

For example, development and evolution are long-term processes in the humanitarian field. I am asking you, does evolution entail innovation, renewal, pioneering? Is evolution ever monotonous?

The other day I was discussing with a friend Darwin’s theory. My friend was saying that according to Darwin’s theory, everything starts as an amoeba, and then becomes a monkey and then it becomes a human being. In my view, the philosophy of the development of the evolving process of change has to be put in the gearbox of every civil society and humanitarian organisation.

Whether amoeba becomes a monkey, or a fish becomes a horse is not the issue. In my opinion, to meet the community’s needs, with our expertise, we have to change our amoeba organisational stage into a horse type delivery. Civil society will always be innovative, dynamic and forward-looking. Our work should not be owned by an individual group, party, religious cult or government. It should be community owned and driven to guarantee the safe delivery of the evolutionary process of change.

If one group dictates the process, amoeba can never become man, as this is against the laws of nature. We must go back to the basics, at community grass root level and allow them own the idea of developing the evolutionary process of change to see the pioneering effect of community owning their cause.

Friday 30 March 2012

The Yoyo

People might be forgiven for thinking that humanitarian workers are all saints, prophets and messengers of humanitarianism. I can assure you that is not the case. We are all human and because we are human, we make mistakes.

Humanitarian organisations, small or large, can dictate policies and build artificial boundaries between themselves and others. The contradiction lies in talking about building bridges with the community and actually doing it. We must build new bridges, not destroy existing ones.  The humanitarian culture can have different clouds, atmospheres or temperatures. What topic could be hot in the bottom tiers could be very cold to subzero in the higher spheres.

It reminds me of a yoyo, going back and forth, or staged photo opportunities between politicians, when they smile at the camera, but not at each other.

The cultural change inside the humanitarian family needs to provide inclusivity, determination and willingness to build bridges. Without them, the body of humanitarian movement cannot be saved.

I say no to the yoyo. Who is with me?

Wednesday 21 March 2012

The Lawmaker, Law Taker and Law Breaker

The other day I had a discussion with a couple of colleagues from the Somali Relief and Development Forum – Jacquelyn and Robert. It was a philosophical-cultural discussion between a young British graduate, a young Canadian woman and myself.

Jacquelyn was talking about the relationship between business organisations and charity organisations and how to make the law function better between them and how to create a healthy relationship between these types of organisations.

Robert looked at me and my appearance and told me that I remind him of a gangster wearing a trilby hat.  I asked him, who is this trilby wearing gangster? A Lawmaker, law breaker or law taker? The difference between the three is quite simple, in my opinion. One might take a break, but the other two break the law.  The trilby wearing gangster can abuse any law, whether at government level, humanitarian level, business level or community level.

It doesn’t matter how good our law is or the way we make it, the Trilby person will find their way inside all interpretations of the law. We need to be careful with such individuals.

Do you know Trilby?

Monday 19 March 2012

MCB Leadership Dinner 2012: Celebrating a year of Sport

I was invited by the Muslim Council of Britain to the Leadership Dinner to speak about the best of the British Sport. Since I am not a sportsman and I used to play only marbles, I am not able to behave like a sportsman.

I gave my speech to the British Muslim community and Muslim communities everywhere. I was quite critical of the role, questioning why we should consider ourselves leaders. I challenged the audience to consider ourselves as servants. The community is the one who can decide to accept our services or not. The community is in fact the leader, because it can make you a leader.

I talked about a number of issues and challenges:

1. Who are our friends and enemies? Everyday men and women will say that Muslims are friends with Muslims and Christians are friends with Christians. That Non-Muslims are enemies to Muslims and Islam. Sheikh Mohammed al-Ghazali from Egypt used to say that the worst enemies of Islam are narrow-minded and ignorant Muslim scholars who give a wrong opinion to the wrong people at the wrong time, via the community. We have to struggle to change our enemies into good and close friends.

2.  The second challenge for me revolves around my having been born in Egypt and come to study in Britain and become a citizen. I came from a glass house society controlled by an authoritarian regime to a very open, democratic society. I thought, as a young graduate, that such a democratic society doesn’t have ceilings or borders for innovation. I discovered after 35 years that I moved from a glass house to somewhere under a glass ceiling, with a hallway at the side, so you can leave if you don’t like it.  This is why we should revisit our way of thinking and remove such a glass ceiling from our democratic society.

3.  The third challenge was the relationship between Muslim leaders and technology, media and a newly growing culture. The challenge for Muslim organisations as well as for me is not to be locked inside a box, but to look out of the box, at the surroundings and become relevant in the context of what’s happening around us.

4. The fourth challenge is the issue of hafiz (the ones who memorise the Quran) and Aalem (scholar of Islam).
There is a trend among Muslim organisations and Mosques to have as many hafiz as possible. This is very good, but not good enough. Hafiz can memorise and recite the Quran. Aalem is the one who can navigate through the wealth of knowledge of the past, present and future, to find the right solution for a contemporary problem.  One Aalem could educate millions of different generations. Thousands of hafiz will memorise and recite the Quran to their surroundings only in the time of their own generation.

5. The fifth challenge is our wrong application of the human interpretation of the Quran, which is affected by the philosophy of our village culture. When you bring such a culture into an open society and make judgements on multilateral complex issues, it is difficult to say the least. One of the vital subjects an Aalem needs to master before he/she can be called a scholar of Islam is the Arabic language as most of the original Islamic knowledge is kept in Arabic. Our wrong application of the human interpretation of the scholars of the past is creating differences, bringing divisions and fragmenting the young growing Muslim society in the West.

6. The sixth challenge is the issue of Zakat (alms due). As we understand, the Zakat must be spent within one year on 8 categories mentioned in the Holy Quran. Unfortunately, we find that some so-called scholars deny the spending of Zakat on non-Muslims, without aiming to convert them to Islam, but make them friends of Islam. They also deny spending Zakat on employing people the run the organisations, paying administrative costs, training people, educating generations, creating think tanks, research centres and other institutions that our society and community needs most. We still think traditionally, but we are living in a non-traditional world.

7. The challenge of ALLOW. The difference between “prevent” and “allow” is that “prevent” is the language of the weak, who wants to forbid people from doing things that could be right. The “allow” language is the language of the strong people, who empower others to be more responsible with the community, even if they may make mistakes. If the Muslim community had had policy-making institutions and pressure groups, it would have impacted on this kind of policy. The research and development policy is not a part of expenditure of Zakat at the back of the minds of Muslim leaders in society.

8. The role of women in Islam. Islam has liberated women 1400 years ago; however some opinions of certain individuals are reversing the time machine to before 1400 years ago, by not allowing women to become a part of Muslim leadership in most organisations, mosques and institutions. Not only that, but also denying the Muslim woman daily space for prayers inside the mosque. As the Prophet (PBUH) said: “Do not prevent the female slave of Allah from coming to the houses of Allah”. Who are we to prevent males or females to come to the house that Allah owns?

9.  The role of youth. The Arab Spring has seen a wave of tsunami magnitude changes in many Arab countries, led by brave male and female youth, who went out to receive beatings, bullets and teargas with bare and open hearts. They became martyrs, not only for their communities, but for humanity.  We shouldn’t think of youth as a scout club, a piece of furniture or a decoration. We should consider youth the current and future leaders of our community. I ask myself: what is the percentage of leaders over 60 and 70 running our organisations and how long have they been in office. The issue of governance has to be addressed.

10. History. Our history has been recorded wrongly. We only know of battles, conquests, plots etc. We hardly ever learn about the history of civil society who lived in Muslim countries for 1400 years and produced a magnificent civilisation. We need to know more about the social history which lead to the building of such a civilisation. It wasn’t the army who built Islamic science, technology and civilisation; it was the citizens of Muslim countries.

To conclude, we shouldn’t look at others for our mistakes. We should consider ourselves accountable. What we need is a positive social climate change in our society. My last comment is on the Sunna of the Prophet (PBUH).  Sunna is about renewal, independence and reasoning (tajdid, ijtihad). The Prophet (PBUH) followed the policy of tajdid and ijtihad. If we do not, we cannot claim we are following the Sunna.

With Mohamed Sbihi, Rowing Champion and his father

Tuesday 13 March 2012

The Polar Bear and the Money

Climate change, global warming, and industrial pollution – these are all affecting our planet. This is happening because of the greed of mankind, who always wants to find the easiest and most profitable way to exist. In my opinion, oil is important; however science nowadays can find a lot of alternative sources of energy. Recently I heard about a new potential catastrophe: investing heavily in the North Pole to extract gold and oil.

What we need to realise is that mankind has been systematically killing other creations of God over the past centuries through ignorance and greed. Sadly, it seems to me that nobody wants to stop the greed of man. Can you imagine what kind of impact an oil spill would have should it happen in this area? I don’t think it will be the polar bears that will benefit from oil exploitation. Somehow, I don’t think we’ll see polar bears with briefcases full of money.

When we lose sight of the rights of the billions of citizens inhabiting the globe, it isn’t a catastrophe. It’s the end of life on Earth! We are also exterminating the lives of other species.

In my view, we need to think seriously about investing in other climate friendly sources of energy. Oil is not the beginning, nor is it the end. The oil industry is just an industry. Alternative sources of energy will give us the means to save our lives and the lives of generations to come.

We need to stop terrorising the environment and work together to create a better world for you and me and the ones who will come after us.